Latest Entries »

New Digital CV

In honour of my 100th post (!) I am proud to unveil a new, interactive version of my CV, which I created using Prezi. One of the key things that employers in communications are looking for is academic staff who are familiar with digital and social media, and a traditional paper CV just wasn’t able to share the multimedia and interactive projects I have been involved in while teaching at UOW. (If only you could embed a YouTube video into a Word document!)

So to that end, this CV contains (nearly) all the same information as my traditional CV (which you can access under the CV tab above), as well as links to both student work on YouTube, Twitter, WordPress, and photos from our virtual world excursions in Second Life, and my own conference presentations and publications. Check it out!

You can navigate it using the path that I have set up (which goes through the CV in a narrative) or pan and zoom using your mouse wheel as you please. Let me know what you think of it!

Curriculum Vitae for K Freund on Prezi

A New Era Begins!

Well, after 4 years (almost to the day) I have passed my PhD examination and will be graduating in June. It’s pretty bittersweet for me, as I really enjoyed doing the PhD and am sad to see it finished now. I did have some rough spots throughout the process, but overall it seemed to all happen very naturally in the end. In the last few months especially, the thing seemed to almost write itself and once the proofreading was done that was that. (I may have rose-coloured glasses on at the moment, though.)

While I was glad I didn’t have to go through the thesis defense that US & Canadian doctoral students have to, I almost wish I did – the Australian process takes so long and ends with an email, instead of with a bang. I submitted in September and the marking was done by December, but I didn’t hear about the result until February. Frustrating, as you might imagine. It just seems rather anti-climactic, in the end. All that work and a massive tome to call my own, and you hear about your result in an email. It’s probably compounded by the fact that I have moved away from all my friends and am living in another city 900 kms away at the moment.

But don’t get me wrong – I am thrilled I have passed, but also terrified as I now have to find something else to occupy me full time!

A group of colleagues from the Uni of Wollongong and I are all heading down to the Digital Humanities Australasia conference from 28-30 March at the Australian National University. Together we will be hosting a panel entitled, “Privacy, ethics, and identity: critical intersections in digital humanities research”, which engages with both user impressions of privacy in online communities and social networks, and also the ethical role of the researcher/ethnographer in relation to user privacy concerns and affordances. As many IRBs / HRECs lag far behind in understandings of participant privacy in digital spaces, our panel will discuss the entitlements of online participants as to privacy, and in particular address if current notions of online privacy still apply in the dynamic landscape of digital humanities research.

I will be discussing in particular some of the ethical research issues that arose from my dissertation research. According to the limitations set by the HREC at my uni, it would be acceptable to use all information gathered from public websites. When researching vidding communities, however, I was struck by the gap between how private the vidders assumed their journals and vids to be, and how public they actually were. While it was deemed public, the vidders didn’t believe it to be so or expect anyone outside of their own peers to be viewing this material, leading to an inevitable ethical issue for me as a researcher.

My fellow panel members will be exploring related issues from their own research into Facebook (Ellen Wilkinson), music communities (Andrew Whelan), and gamers (Chris Moore). I’m looking forward to it!

 

Anyone out there interested in joining me at this upcoming conference at the University of Sydney? I should have moved back down to Wollongong by June, which means it will be an easy jaunt to Syd for this conference. Paper proposals are due by 1 December, so there’s still time to apply. The conference is from 9-13 July 2012.

Here’s the details: http://conference.acspri.org.au/index.php/rc33/2012/index

Hope to see some of you there! If you are attending, leave a comment and we can meet up for coffee.

We all know the ending to this one. For the second time this year, I have received an invitation from a publisher to contribute my work to their publication, and it turns out to be a scam. I find it particularly cruel as I’m in that weird position between finishing the PhD and becoming an ECR*, and desperately trying to increase my publication record. It can be a long and difficult process, as I’m sure many of my readers will know. So while I’m working on writing and submitting and awaiting responses from journals, I get these scam emails and all of a sudden I’m so excited! And then my rational brain switches on and I turn to Google.  Yup… scams. So here’s my public service announcement to my comrades out there:

If you receive any emails from Verlag De Muller (VDM) Publishing or any journals from David Publishing, don’t reply. VDM publishes absolutely everything they receive without fact-checking and doesn’t print any copies and charges a fortune to get any made up. (See this blog post for details.) David Publishing solicits on behalf several different journals (mine was “Journalism and Mass Communication”), and accepts everything without review before then asking you to pay $50 per page to have it printed. (Thanks to The Trial Warrior for this post.)

I say shame on these fake publishers. You toy with my hopes!!

Oh well. Here’s something to make us all feel better:

(Cheers to http://verydemotivational.memebase.com/2011/11/14/demotivational-posters-what-the-duck/)

 

There. That’s better.

 

*I’m not sure if ECR is a common term outside of Australia, but it refers to “early career researcher”, or someone in the first five years after their PhD.

This week has been the “Festival of Teaching” at SCU where I currently work. I was initially quite enthused about the various panels to be held throughout the week, but now looking back I think “bereft” is perhaps the best word to describe my feelings about it. It seems to me that to be a good teacher, what leads to good practice, and what makes students happy and the most engaged in the material requires is the key thing that academics — particularly casual academics such as myself — don’t have. That is, of course, time.

I loved all the great examples of teaching methods and approaches outlined in the Good Teaching Showcase on Wednesday afternoon. The educators who presented where passionate about their subjects, and about having the best possible results from their students every year in terms of quality teaching and also meaningful engagement. Almost all of the presenters pointed to the importance of the design of the subject from the very beginning. In order to foster critical thinking, build in reflective or journal tasks. Mandatory participation in the form of blogs, forums, seminars, and so forth was also recommend to provoke greater engagement from the students, and many ITC solutions were offered, such as Elluminate and Second Life.

I want to provide the best possible environment for students, and to turn every class into one that the students will look back on and think, “That class changed how I think about everyday life.” Hopefully it was fun at the same time. But as a casual, particularly now that I am teaching external (online-only) students, I just don’t have the time. I knowthis problem isn’t unique to casuals either, but in our case it is of particular importance. I only get paid for one hour of prep per week (per subject), one hour for contact per student per session, and one hour for “online” per week (which means checking the discussion boards and answering emails). If I wanted to design a visually stimulating Elluminate session (as Tony Yeigh recommended at the conference), I suspect it would take me a whole day to prepare, never mind deliver.

I always end up working more hours that I can claim each week, but I still want to offer a good experience to the students. I considered using Facebook as a discussion tool instead of the Blackboard site (as it’s a ghost town), but a colleague advised me not to as she predicted it would double my workload. I then trialled Elluminate, but was again advised that only one or two students will attend the live sessions unless they are mandatory, and so they are not worth it in terms of the massive time committment required to plan and execute it.

As as this ABC report points out, nearly 60% of all teaching at universities is done by casuals in the same position. (And most are worse off than myself: my teaching load is manageable with only two subjects, and I have no mortgage or children to worry about in terms of finances.)

So I have left the Festival of Teaching rather demoralised. It seems as though if you want to commit to offering  quality teaching to your students, you have to make do with long, unpaid hours. Is there any solution? I don’t foresee the corporate and institutionalised culture of universities changing any time soon.

Hey interwebs, I’m looking for a third person to join in on a conference panel I’m brainstorming. It would be for the Digital Humanities Conference coming up at ANU in late March, although the proposals are due relatively soon (11 November). My basic idea was to give 3 papers on the joint theme of expectations and assumptions of privacy in online communities. My paper would discuss how privacy and confidentiality were conceptualised in the vidding community, and I’ve got a comrade from UOW to join in on Australian undergraduate’s understandings of privacy on Facebook. I have imagined the panel as dealing not so much with privacy law or possibilities, but rather with evidence-based and contextualised cases where users have to engage with privacy in their internet use. Of course, a more abstract / theoretical paper dealing with expectations of privacy might match well with two evidence / ethnographic-based papers as well.

Is anyone out there doing research in this area who might like to provide the third paper on this (or a similar) topic? Drop me a comment or an email at fanthropology (at) gmail (dot) com.

new teaching challenges

well, i’ve moved away from the beautiful, beachside wollongong. i’m now located 850 kms north in lismore, nsw. my partner was assigned a (mandatory) year-long placement here, and i decided to follow along as i’m getting towards the end of my phd now and i’m able to be a bit more flexible in how often i’m on campus. luckily for me, southern cross university here in lismore had quite the opportunity for me so i will be lecturing and tutoring for a first year subject on global media. it’s a bit of a stretch for me, topic-wise, but in a way that i am finding really appealing.

when i was preparing to teach my first tutorial at wollongong, i told the coordinator that i was nervous and that i wasn’t familiar with some of the subject areas i was to be teaching in. (it was similarly a first year new media subject, and like most first-year subject incredibly broad in its scope.) the coordinator told me that from his experience, teaching was one of the best ways to learn new things that you don’t have the time to study otherwise. this has indeed been the case for me. as australian phd programmes don’t have any coursework, comprehensive exams, or reading lists, you end up becoming incredibly specialised on your particular topic — sometimes to your detriment. i missed the variety of my undergrad (once described by a uni employee as “eclectic”) but have found that i can explore new topics through teaching.

while it’s taken me ages to figure out how to use it (and i must confess i’m still making sense of the intricacies of it), i’ve absolutely fallen in love with the presentation software, prezi. it’s easily accessible through their website, prezi.com. it’s based more on a mind-map kind of system rather than being as linear and structured as powerpoint. a few other lecturers i know use it, and students seem to love it while it’s live in the classroom, but it’s not quite as easy to follow as powerpoint if you didn’t make it to the actual class. it took me a long time to get used to writing lectures using it, as i had been quite brainwashed by powerpoint myself and it took me quite a bit of time to educate myself in prezi’s ways. but give it a go if you’re curious – i recommend viewing some of the example and tutorial videos as they are quite helpful.

so i’m currently researching and drafting my last body chapter, which will be generally about the influence of copyright on the livejournal vidding community. reading about copyright is often tedious as the laws are quite complex, long-winded, and law journals use footnotes to an almost obscene degree. the examples i’m finding in work by rosemary coombe (2001), demers (2006) and others have many, many examples of ridiculous applications of copyright law in cases that seem much more like bullying than a valid legal complaint. my favourite is one cited in both books where disney forced a childcare centre to take the pictures of disney characters off their wall. someone explain that one to me. in my own research, i came across a fan website which was issued a cease-and-desist letter from the MPAA (motion picture association of america) demanding that they stop using the phrase “NC-17″ to denote stories with sexual content or adult themes. i can’t help but wonder how using this phrase affects the MPAA in any way. it’s absolutely hilarious, but at the same time just makes my blood boil.

Book review publication

My colleagues Ruth Walker and Chris Moore guest-edited a volume of the International Journal for Educational Integrity, and invited me to write a book review for them. It’s for John Hartley’s The Uses of Digital Literacy (2009), and you can read it online here: http://www.ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/IJEI/article/view/706

I was a little nervous to review the book of an eminent scholar, particularly here in Australia, especially as it was my first review. But I did my best, and there it is! Let me know what you think, interwebs.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 232 other followers